🔗 Share this article

Only two days before the NYC race for mayor, political analyst Michael Lange issued a significant electoral prediction – not just the winner citywide, and block by block. Lange, an expert in elections who grew up in the city, devoted more than ten years in progressive politics and emerged as a kind of local celebrity recently for his thorough analyses into city data and voter surveys.

He published his highly detailed prediction map – accurately predicting that the progressive candidate was victorious while missing Andrew Cuomo’s strong performance – on his Substack, his platform. He possesses a talent for witty coinages. He pointed out, for instance, the divide between the progressive stronghold, stretching from one neighborhood to another area to Astoria, where he forecasted (correctly) that the left-wing candidate would win by large leads, and the “capitalist corridor” on affluent parts of Manhattan. There, certain media outlets and Wall Street Journal outrank the New York Times” in audience and most voters leaned toward Cuomo, who ran as a conservative-courting independent.

Election Night Patterns and Surprises

How was your night?

I had to do that since they were dropping approximately 200K votes into the tally every few minutes! I felt a little nervous at the beginning: Mamdani was ahead the early vote by a dozen percentage points, but there were large groups of ballots added later and his lead went from 12 to 8%. It was concerning.

Understand, there was a world where yesterday turned out somewhat badly for him, where the opponent would have essentially doubling his votes from the earlier contest. However the winner gained half a million supporters to his initial base, and this was critical why he won. He went out and massively expanded his support from the primary.

Expanding Support

Where did the mayor-elect gain additional support from?

He built the coalition that the left always wanted to build: diverse racially, youthful, it’s renters and individuals facing cost pressures. He improved considerably with minority communities, everyday New Yorkers, relative to the earlier election. Additionally he boosted his base of liberal progressives, young leftists, and Muslims and south Asians. He couldn’t have won without expanding his appeal.

He created the coalition that progressives long aimed for: multiracial, youthful, tenants and residents squeezed by affordability

Additionally, there were a number of supporters of both candidates – is this significant?

It’s definitely a genuine phenomenon, confined to working-class Latinos, Asian communities and Muslims. Electors in ethnic enclaves that went for Trump previously went for the progressive now. However I wouldn’t say he was gaining white working-class voters and Maga voters.

Voter Participation and Effects

One of the big stories of the election was the record turnout. Who benefited?

Both sides. Turnout was much greater than I had expected. I thought we might go over two million, but it’s closer to 2.3 million – which is a lot of darn voters. Existed a substantial opposition group, energized, but his supporters was also motivated, and that was enough to secure victory.

You forecasted he’d get over half the ballots. Is he likely for that?

Currently you would say he’s favored to get over 50%. He’s at 50.4% but there’s still probably 200K ballots left to report at that time. So I don’t think it’s definitive, but I believe it’s likely, and I wish he achieves it because then no one can say the Republican was a spoiler.

GOP Decline

Curtis Sliwa, the Republican candidate, was another surprise. His support plummeted.

He didn’t win any district in any borough. Including Tottenville in the borough, similar to an highly conservative neighborhood. That really surprised me. Cuomo held Caucasian districts, very wealthy areas and very religiously Jewish areas, and plus gained all of these conservatives on Staten Island who had a high participation. I think occurred a lot of strategic balloting by the Republicans. They were doing it before Trump tweeted his support for the candidate, but that definitely helped. It might have changed the outcome if Mamdani’s coalition hadn’t grown.

Progressive Strongholds

What about your often-discussed left-wing base – did backing for Mamdani overwhelming in those parts of Brooklyn and Queens?

I think there was a little dilution of the commie corridor in some areas like neighborhoods that have older Caucasian residents. In Astoria, instance, the Greek landlords and residents all went for the independent. So there was a little resistance. However no, mostly the leftist base is another huge reason why Mamdani prevailed – he scored between 77% and 83% in specific neighborhoods.

Jewish Voters

Prior to the vote we reported on whether Mamdani was making inroads with Jewish New Yorkers. Any indication that he did?

There are neighborhoods with many secular and more progressive-leaning Jews – like specific locales – where he did well. However in the affluent districts like the Upper East Side, his Middle East stance was influential there. Similarly in the moderate communities including Queens neighborhoods, or Bronx areas – they all leaned Cuomo. And also, you have newcomers from Eastern Europe in the borough, they were strongly supportive. So it’s unclear if existed major surprises here, but he did hold left-leaning areas and even parts of the Upper West Side by big margins.

Political Impact

Did Mamdani redefine what the city represents in politics? Will the commie corridor become a launch pad for progressive contenders?

Absolutely, it’s no coincidence that some of the biggest figures from progressives hail from a few areas in the boroughs. I’m sure that there will be additional examples – candidates will come from these neighborhoods to be elevated nationally.

But I think that every city in the US can have their own commie corridor. Urban places are the centers of leftwing power in America – since they’re young, tenancy is common and they represent locales where people are crushed by the inequalities we face.