🔗 Share this article

Are your LinkedIn connections viewing you as a thought leader? Are hordes of respondents applauding your insights on growing your business? Are headhunters reaching out to discuss opportunities?

If not, the explanation might be your gender.

The Test: Modifying Profile Gender for Increased Reach

Numerous women joined an organized LinkedIn experiment this week following popular discussions indicated that changing their profile gender to "man" boosted their platform visibility.

Some participants rewrote their profiles to include what they called "bro-coded" terminology - adding action-focused business buzzwords like "drive", "transform" and "accelerate". Based on reports, their exposure similarly increased.

Systemic Preference Concerns Raised

The engagement increase has led some to speculate whether an inherent gender bias in LinkedIn's algorithm favors male users who use professional networking terminology.

Like most major networking sites, LinkedIn utilizes a computerized system to determine which content are shown to which members - boosting some while suppressing others.

Company Statement

Through a blog post, LinkedIn recognized the trend but claimed it does not consider "personal characteristics" when deciding content distribution. Instead, the company mentioned that "numerous factors" affect how content are received.

Changing gender in your settings does not influence how your content appears in search or feed.

Individual Results

A social media consultant, who modified her pronouns to "he/him" and her name to "a masculine version", reported extraordinary outcomes.

"The statistics I'm seeing indicate a sixteen-fold rise in visitor traffic and a 1,300% increase in content views," she commented.

Another professional, a communications strategist, began experimenting after observing her audience decrease substantially.

The Process

• First, she modified her profile gender to "man"
• Subsequently, she used artificial intelligence to rephrase her profile using "male-coded" wording
• Lastly, she repurposed previous content with similar "assertive" style

The result was immediate: a 415% increase in reach within one week.

The Downside

Although the success, Cornish voiced dissatisfaction with the method.

"Before, my content were more personal - concise and clever, but also friendly and human," she explained. "Now, the bro-coded version was forceful and self-assured - like a white male swaggering around."

She abandoned the experiment after one week, stating "Each day I persisted, and results improved, I became angrier."

Mixed Results

Not all testers experienced favorable outcomes. Cass Cooper who changed both her gender to "male" and her race to "Caucasian" reported a reduction in visibility and interaction.

"We understand there's algorithmic bias, but it's extremely difficult to comprehend how it operates in specific cases or why," she remarked.

Wider Consequences

These tests occur alongside continuing conversations about LinkedIn's distinctive position as both a business platform and community site.

Recent changes in recent months have apparently caused women professionals experiencing markedly lower visibility, resulting in unofficial tests where identical content by men and women received dramatically unequal audience engagement.

System Details

Per LinkedIn, the platform uses AI systems to classify and distribute posts based on multiple factors, including post content and the member's career profile.

The company claims it regularly evaluates its algorithms, including "checks for inequalities based on gender."

A spokesperson proposed that current reductions in certain members' visibility might stem from increased competition due to additional posts on the platform.

Evolving Environment

As one participant noted, "bro-coding" appears to be increasing on the platform.

"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more businesslike and refined," she commented. "That's changing. It's becoming increasingly aggressive and unpredictable."