🔗 Share this article

Over the weekend, the game developers launched a new playlist titled Casual Breakthrough. To put it simply, this mode resembles the standard Breakthrough format but features a few notable adjustments:

• Every squad has just eight real players, with the remaining filled by AI-controlled opponents.
• Activities performed by real players award complete experience points, while AI activities offer reduced XP.
• Just a pair of locations are available: Siege of Cairo and Empire State map.
• Features like Player tags, accolades, and career stat updates are disabled.

So essentially, this mode delivers on its title: it's a casual take of Breakthrough. At face value, you might think there's nothing wrong, as it gives more options for gamers looking for different methods to have fun with the title. But, gaming history have taught us anything, it is that not everyone will be happy. Which is to say, many BF6 players are upset.

Player Reactions: Anger to Support

"Gamers prefer real players. Avoid making the errors of your rivals," states a response to the mode reveal. "Absolutely shocking concept," comments another. Meanwhile, in community forums, one user notes, "I have no idea where we are going with this game," and someone else lists everything they believe to be problematic in the game: "Fix bugs, address drone issues, fix IVF rockets, adjust aiming after sprinting, fix awful hit registration. We do not require this AI-heavy playlist."

However, amid the criticism, there are players sharing how much they're enjoying the recent addition. "It's very fun to warm up, human participants keep it from being a complete grind but it's very relaxed," says one Reddit comment. "This subreddit doesn't understand that there are gamers who actually go outside and don't play this title 24/7. Let them find a middle ground," states another. One reply via social media explains that as they're "a battledad with busy schedules, this is great for me," while another praises the mode for "not being overcompetitive."

Constructive Concerns and Player Feedback

All that said, players have constructive reasons to criticize the new mode. Some users have pointed out that it could increase queue times even longer for different playlists due to the large amount of options in the game already. Similarly, certain regions often face mostly bots in the existing playlists. It also seems a little backwards that the mode does not begin without a required amount of real players, even though it focuses mostly on fighting AI opponents.

Lastly, a major complaints is that Battlefield Portal was meant to provide full XP, even against bots, but that got canned when they tried to remove bot farms from the mode. So this new playlist feels like the player base meeting them in the middle, according to forum feedback. A different user labels this addition as the devs "making a mistake significantly, I had so much fun in the first couple of days, what prompted them to adjust it?"

Looking Ahead: Will Changes Be Made?

Should Battlefield Studios has demonstrated something so far with Battlefield 6, it's that they're listening and responding to player input. Tasks that were overly hard were adjusted very quickly, just like the specific battle pass objectives. It is likely that, if their data shows this new playlist is underperforming to their expectations, they will not hesitate to make further modifications.