🔗 Share this article

Deductibles. Preferred providers. Out-of-network. Premium health services. Out-of-pocket expenses. Co-payment. Shared insurance. Insurance consultants. Insurance brokers. Medical advisors. Affordable Care Act. HMO. PPO. EPO. POS. HDHP. Health Savings Account. FSA. Health Reimbursement Arrangement. Explanation of Benefits. Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act. Small Business Health Options Program. Individual coverage. Family coverage. Premium tax credits.

Baffled? You should be. Who understands all this stuff? Not the typical entrepreneur. Nor the typical employee. Selecting the right medical coverage for companies – or for our families – appears to require it requires a PhD in healthcare.

The Medical System Isn't Just Complicated, It Is Expensive

According to recent research, the average family pays $twenty-seven thousand each year on medical coverage (up 6% compared to last year). The average employer health insurance cost is expected to surpass $17,000 per employee by 2026, a 9.5% jump from 2025.

Currently federal operations has ceased functioning because partisan disputes regarding subsidies which analysts predict will lead to a doubling of premiums for millions of Americans.

When Might We Truly Examine National Health Insurance?

How soon might we seriously consider a national health insurance program in the United States? I'm convinced we're approaching that point because this situation is unsustainable.

I'm not suggesting national healthcare. I'm advocating for our current Medicare program – an established insurance framework – merely extend to include all citizens. Our infrastructure doesn't change. The way medical professionals receive payment would change. Believe me, they will adjust.

How National Health Insurance Would Work

Universal healthcare coverage would need payments from both employees and employers. In similar programs, a worker making average wages pays approximately five point three percent to their healthcare. The company pays about 13.75%.

Does this appear like a lot? Not if you compare it to what the typical US resident spends. I can name dozens of businesses who are routinely paying anywhere from 8% to 15% of their employee wages for medical benefits. Remember that in inclusive programs, these contributions include retirement benefits, illness coverage, parental benefits and unemployment benefits in addition to funding healthcare facilities. When including those costs compared with our current spending for our retirement plans, unemployment insurance and paid time off, the gap narrows.

Execution in the US

For America, universal healthcare funding would increase our Medicare tax deduction, a framework that is already in place. It ought to be income-adjusted – those at higher income levels would contribute higher amounts than those earning less. This includes both an employee and company payments. Similar to much of federal defense, IT, social programs and infrastructure, the system could be managed by private contractors rather than a government office.

Benefits for Small Businesses

A national health insurance program represents a huge benefit for small businesses such as my company. It would place us on a level playing field against big corporations that can pay for superior coverage. It would render administration much easier (a payroll deduction processed similarly to social security and Medicare taxes, instead of separate payments to benefit firms and insurance providers).

It would enable simpler for us to budget our yearly costs, instead of going through the complex (and ineffective) theater of negotiating with the big insurance providers that we must do every year. Due to simplification, there would be improved comprehension of coverage among workers – contrasted with existing arrangements where they have to interpret the complexities of existing plans. And there would certainly be reduced responsibility for companies as we no longer have access to our employees' medical records for risk assessment and different options.

Free-Market Viewpoint

I'm as capitalist as possible. But I've learned that government has a significant role in society, from providing defense to funding needed infrastructure. Ensuring medical coverage to all via universal healthcare enhances economic foundations. It represents superior, easier system for entrepreneurs which hire the majority of American employees and fund half the economic output. It makes it possible employees to enjoy better health, have better attendance and be more productive.

Considering Challenges

Are there a million considerations I haven't covered? Of course there are. Given all the healthcare cost increases we've seen in recent years, it's evident that the Affordable Care Act is not working effectively. And I realize that America isn't a small, Scandinavian country where major reforms can be readily adopted. However extending universal Medicare, even with the additional taxes required, would remain a superior and more affordable approach for not only controlling healthcare costs and ensuring coverage to everyone.

Need for Honest Assessment

We as Americans, we need to tone down national pride. Our healthcare system isn't exceptional. The US places significantly behind many other countries in healthcare quality in the world, based on comprehensive research. Maybe one bright spot amid current situation could be that we undertake a hard look in the mirror and agree that major reforms need to happen.